<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the earley edition &#187; myspace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earleyedition.com/tag/myspace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earleyedition.com</link>
	<description>David Earley - exploring digital journalism and cross-platform delivery of new media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CIA notes declining newspaper influence</title>
		<link>http://earleyedition.com/2008/02/09/cia-notes-declining-newspaper-influence/</link>
		<comments>http://earleyedition.com/2008/02/09/cia-notes-declining-newspaper-influence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Earley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earleyedition.com/blog/2008/02/09/cia-notes-declining-newspaper-influence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CIA may not hold the same respect they once had, but you must admit their intelligence-gathering techniques must still be superior to either yours or mine. The CIA have said newspapers have not just become less important as a source of information, but are in freefall when compared to the growing importance of online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/cia2.jpg' alt='CIA logo' />The CIA may not hold the same respect they once had, but you must admit their intelligence-gathering techniques must still be superior to either yours or mine.</p>
<p>The CIA have said newspapers have not just become less important as a source of information, but are in freefall when compared to the growing importance of online information gathering.</p>
<p>From Doug Naikin, director of the CIA&#8217;s Open Source Center (OSC), formerly the Foreign Broadcast Information Service which was tasked to collect and analyse public information, comes the following.</p>
<blockquote><p>What we&#8217;re seeing [in] actuality is a decline, a relatively rapid decline, in the impact of the printed press &#8211; traditional media.<br />
A lot more is digital, and a lot more is online. It&#8217;s also a lot more social. Interaction is a much bigger part of media and news than it used to be.</p></blockquote>
<p>So watch out.  The CIA is trawling your Facebook, Myspace, YouTube and any other social networking media you can think of.  Just don&#8217;t say the &#8216;B&#8217; word.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.ejc.net/media_news/cia_monitors_youtube_for_intelligence/#When:08:48:00Z">EJC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://earleyedition.com/2008/02/09/cia-notes-declining-newspaper-influence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email is old news to Generation C</title>
		<link>http://earleyedition.com/2008/01/31/email-is-old-news-to-generation-c/</link>
		<comments>http://earleyedition.com/2008/01/31/email-is-old-news-to-generation-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Earley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninemsn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earleyedition.com/blog/2008/01/31/email-is-old-news-to-generation-c/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the LAMP blog, a podcast with Head of Innovation at Nine MSN Jennifer Wilson is instructional for those pushing online news as a social, sharing medium. She describes Generation C as the 12-24 age range, who think email is for their parents &#8211; it&#8217;s outdated. They almost exclusively communicate via social networking. So what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lamp.edu.au/about-lamp/" title='LAMP - Laboratory of Advanced Media Production'><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/lamplogo.jpg' alt='LAMP - Laboratory of Advanced Media Production' /></a>On the <a href="http://lamp.edu.au/about-lamp/">LAMP</a> blog, a<a href="http://lamp.edu.au/2008/01/16/podcast-jennifer-wilson-generation-c-and-z/"> podcast with Head of Innovation at Nine MSN Jennifer Wilson</a> is instructional for those pushing online news as a social, sharing medium.</p>
<p>She describes Generation C as the 12-24 age range, who think email is for their parents &#8211; it&#8217;s outdated.  They almost exclusively communicate via social networking.</p>
<p>So what are online news sites doing to push every possible integration with social networking sites to increase coverage in this demographic &#8211; other than selling out news coverage for entertainment?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://nytimes.com">New York Times</a> has started <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/news/2008/01/new_york_times_mobile_news_through_text.php">text message news alerts via keywords</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the text message news alerts are different than the text/im/web updates that are already available through their various <a href="https://twitter.com/nytimes">New York Times Twitter updates</a>.  I imagine having the in-house control of text message distribution of news opens more possibilities for monetisation of that media further down the track, rather than waiting for Twitter to start advertising.</p>
<p><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/nytimes-facebook.jpg' alt='New York Times on Facebook' />The New York Times also has a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/nytimes?ref=s">Facebook</a> page (approaching 10,000 &#8216;fans&#8217;) and Rob Larson, vice president of product development and management at NYTimes.com said, &#8220;We intend to use every available platform to disseminate The Times&#8217;s quality news and information.&#8221;<br />
via <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/news/2008/01/new_york_times_mobile_news_through_text.php">The Editors Weblog</a></p>
<p>The New York Times is by no means the only media organisation experimenting with digital access and social networking for news.  They&#8217;re just recognised as one of the leading ones.</p>
<p>In Australia, very few news organisations use Twitter.  As full disclosure, before I continue, I&#8217;m a journalist at <a href="http://couriermail.com.au">The Courier Mail</a> newspaper, where I worked as an online multimedia producer until December last year before moving into editorial.</p>
<p><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/twitter1.jpg' alt='Twitter logo' />I set up Twitter accounts for all of The Courier Mail&#8217;s news sections in early October last year, making our newspaper one of the only two news outlets in Australia using Twitter (that I have found), and definitely one of the largest media contributors to Twitter by number of content categories, but not necessarily volume of content.  </p>
<p>Our current crop of 20 Twitter user accounts are providing free SMS/IM updates on topics ranging from sports, to business, to breaking news, all with <a href="http://tinyurl.com">tinyurl</a> links to the original story content. I&#8217;m now trying to find time to play around with a Facebook page for The Courier Mail, although I rarely have any spare hours at home to spend doing that.</p>
<p>During the process of setting up these Twitter accounts, I did a search to see if other Australian news outlets were already using Twitter.</p>
<p>Of <a href="http://news.com.au">News Limited</a> mastheads, apart from The Courier Mail, none of the other existing News Ltd Twitter users have posted.<br />
Of Fairfax mastheads, only The Age has a single feed, last updated in May 2007.<br />
The <a href="http://abc.net.au/news">ABC</a> has two feeds &#8211; one of which I follow to receive local news alerts on my mobile phone.</p>
<div align="center"><strong>An informal audit of a selection of Australian media and their Twitter presence</strong></div>
</p>
<p><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/fairfax-logo.jpg' alt='Fairfax Digital logo' /><strong>Fairfax masthead sites</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://smh.com.au">Sydney Morning Herald</a> &#8211; none, although there is a user account for an SMH columnist<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/samanthabrett">https://twitter.com/samanthabrett</a> &#8211; last and only update May 2007</li>
<li><a href="http://theage.com.au">The Age</a> &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/theage">http://twitter.com/theage</a> &#8211; last update May 2007</li>
<li><a href="http://brisbanetimes.com.au">Brisbane Times</a> &#8211; none</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/abc-logo.jpg' alt='ABC News - logo' /><a href="http://abc.net.au/news"><strong>ABC News</strong></a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/abcnewsbrisbane">http://twitter.com/abcnewsbrisbane</a> &#8211; regularly updated through day</li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/abcnews">http://twitter.com/abcnews</a> &#8211; regularly updated through day</li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/abcrn">http://twitter.com/abcrn</a> &#8211; ABC Radio National &#8211; deleted since December</li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/abctv">http://twitter.com/abctv</a> &#8211; an example of a squatter.  Two updates, one of which is &#8220;can&#8217;t believe this one wasn&#8217;t taken&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="right frame" src='http://earleyedition.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ndm-logo.jpg' alt='News Digital Media - News Limited logo' /><strong>News Limited masthead sites</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/">The Australian</a> &#8211; <a href="https://twitter.com/theaustralian">https://twitter.com/theaustralian</a> &#8211; never updated</li>
<li><a href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/">The Daily Telegraph</a> &#8211; <a href="https://twitter.com/dailytelegraph">https://twitter.com/dailytelegraph</a> &#8211; never updated</li>
<li><a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/">The Herald Sun</a> &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/heraldsun">http://twitter.com/heraldsun</a> &#8211; never updated</li>
<li><a href="http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/">AdelaideNow</a> &#8211; <a href="https://twitter.com/adelaidenow">https://twitter.com/adelaidenow</a> &#8211; never updated</li>
<li><a href="http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/">PerthNow</a> &#8211; <a href="https://twitter.com/perthnow">https://twitter.com/perthnow</a> &#8211; never updated</li>
<li><a href="http://www.news.com.au/mercury/">The Mercury</a> &#8211; <a href="https://twitter.com/themercury">https://twitter.com/themercury</a> &#8211; never updated</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ntnews.news.com.au/">NT News</a> &#8211; none</li>
<li><a href="http://couriermail.com.au">The Courier Mail</a> &#8211; 20 <a href="http://twitter.com/tw/search/users?q=cmail">Twitter accounts</a> (as at January 31, 2008) updated whenever new content available on site</li>
</ul>
<p>I am assuming the unused Twitter accounts above belong to these publications, but it&#8217;s entirely possible someone could simply be &#8216;squatting&#8217; on the Twitter user names.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://twitter.com/search/users?q=news">search for &#8220;news&#8221;</a> in Twitter, yields a lot of results. Here are just a few (listed as their Twitter user name) that may be of interest &#8211;  <a href="http://twitter.com/financialtimes">financialtimes</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/nprnews">npr news</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/cbcnews">cbcnews</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/wired">wired</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/ITN_NEWS">ITN_NEWS</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/BBC">BBC</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/SkyNewsBusiness">SkyNewsBusiness</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/indianews">indianews</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/SkyNews">SkyNews</a>, and <a href="http://twitter.com/CNETNews">CNETNews</a>.</p>
<p>In the UK, the BBC and Sky have a larger selection of Twitter updates that can be followed.</p>
<div align="center">
<hr width="50%"/></div>
<p>The 2007 federal election was approaching when I was working on the Courier Mail Twitter accounts so, having already written a story about politics and social networking, I had a look at what political parties had on Twitter.</p>
<p>At the time the results were:<br />
Greens: <a href="http://twitter.com/Greens">http://twitter.com/Greens</a><br />
Three updates in total, all on August 2, 2007, that are worth mentioning.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Greens have established a twitter and are testing it.<br />
<code>04:11 PM August 02, 2007</code><br />
 Do you receive my Greens twitter?<br />
<code>04:26 PM August 02, 2007</code><br />
Hrrrmmm, if I was 14 I&#8217;d know exactly what would happen<br />
<code>06:39 PM August 02, 2007</code></p></blockquote>
<p>Liberal (both spoofs)<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/johnhoward">http://twitter.com/johnhoward</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/johnhowardfacts">http://twitter.com/johnhowardfacts</a><br />
Labor: none<br />
Democrats: none<br />
Nationals: none</p>
<p>In 2008, however, the Greens seem to have got their act together with a Twitter page feeding from the Greens Blog website.<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/greensblog">https://twitter.com/greensblog</a></p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t find this during the election last year , but <a href="https://twitter.com/kevinrudd">https://twitter.com/kevinrudd</a> is another spoof Twitter account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://earleyedition.com/2008/01/31/email-is-old-news-to-generation-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

