Well before use

If you were a lawyer, how successfully do you think you could you argue that the instruction to shake a can “well before use” was ambiguous, and in need of clearer definition?

Is it “Shake well before use”

or

“Shake well before use” ?

Could you argue the latter on behalf of a client for whom unfortunate consequences had resulted from not shaking immediately before use?

You be the judge.

No, I’m the judge. You be the lawyer.

Share:
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Photographer’s Rights and Citizen Journalism - a collection of links
  • Boyer Lecture 4 - Fortune favours the smart
  • uTag - gaming the link economy
  • Transcript of Jay Rosen’s SABEW workshop
  • links for 2008-07-28
  • 4 comments ↓

    #1 Blonde at Heart on 10.04.06 at 3:55 pm

    I do not see the difference, your Honour. Could you please explain this to me?

    #2 Dave on 10.04.06 at 4:12 pm

    Shake [well - vigorously] before use
    or
    shake [well before - a long time prior to] use

    #3 Suzanne on 10.06.06 at 3:21 pm

    I’ve got to go with “Shake Well, Before Use” (the comma does help a little). I would suggest that arguing the other doesn’t bode well for your client’s ability to exist unaided in the universe, but then again…

    #4 Dave on 10.06.06 at 3:59 pm

    Oh, not my client, yours! As judge, I’ve already decided your client’s ability to exist unaided in the universe is nil, and he’s just a slacker looking for an easy payout. I’m hoping the jury will give me the chance to tell him how frivolous his lawsuit was. If you can convince the jury, well, props to you and they also go on my list of idiots.

    You can call me Judy. Judge Judy. “Shut yo’ mouth!”

    Leave a Comment